{{c.by}}
{{c.verdict}}
Claim checked
{{c.claim}}
What the record shows{{c.finding}}
The Supreme Court struck down the president’s emergency tariffs in February. A 10% global replacement tariff expired July 24, and the administration now relies on other laws. Congress has not passed a tariff bill.
Updated Nov. 6, 2026 · 4 sources · 4 minute read
Left: what Republicans say, in their own words. Right: the same for Democrats. Middle: the record. The record is not a third opinion. We check claims from both sides against documents and data and give each one a verdict. What the verdicts mean
Greer cites “a $1.2 trillion trade deficit” as the reason tariffs stay.
Jamieson Greer · U.S. Trade Representative · July 22 · AP via WJLA
Greer: keep tariffs as a core tool, now through Section 301 and 232.
Sen. Bernie Moreno: restore Trump’s tariff power through a second reconciliation bill.
Rep. Adrian Smith: write the trade agenda into law so it outlasts one administration.
Tariffs bring revenue and leverage, shrink the trade deficit and rebuild factories, so they should stay under whatever law allows them. (Based on Greer and House Speaker Mike Johnson as reported by AP and Axios.)
Each card shows who made the claim, what the claim was, and what the documents and data show.
{{c.claim}}
What the record shows{{c.finding}}
“Big victory for the American people.”
Hakeem Jeffries · House Democratic Leader · Feb. 20 · Washington Examiner
Schumer: end the trade war.
Jeffries: treat the ruling as a defeat for governing by decree.
Jeffries (Sept.): restore Congress’s say on tariffs.
Tariffs are taxes that Congress, not the president alone, should set, and the trade war has gone on long enough. (Based on Schumer and Jeffries as reported by Axios.)
{{u.text}}
Every claim above links to its source. Read them yourself and decide.
Nov. 6, 2026 No corrections so far. Several items here are from February and July. We will add current statements when we find them.